Leon Bendesky / La Jornada Inegi recently told
EI 13 and a half million people working in the informal , which he characterized as those occupations without access to Social Security or any benefit.
This amounts, according to the agency, to 28.5 percent of the population in age and able to work, or who are between 14 and 65. This, which is called economically active population (EAP), sum 47 and a half million people. Tell
population is engaged in informal activities is an element to approach a better understanding of the employment situation and the consequent general social conditions in the country. It is part
also other considerations such as the effect on fiscal management both in terms of revenue received by the treasury as budget expenditures that are made to meet the conditions of life.
is a part of the sources and uses of public resources and the efficiency with which they are administered. Efficiency can not, of course, limited to accounting and financial criteria, but must somehow be extended to consider social efficiency.
forms are counting the informal variety. Inegi measurement is essentially based on the National Survey of Occupation and Employment. This should be supplemented with information from the National Survey of Income and Expenditure Survey, which is raised every two years.
Thus, the criteria for defining and counting the informal can be extended and refined. Both the coverage representing informality as its meaning changed and can offer a better perspective of social conditions.
With both tools leads to better classification of informal activities and providing the other party relevant to the considerations on the labor market and that has to do with income.
In terms of numbers, can be counted as informal manner up to 30 million people, ie twice the official estimate now provides Inegi. The share of informality in the labor force arrives, therefore the order of 60 percent. As to income, the average is at the order of 3 pesos per month in 1500.
Another issue has to do with the type of occupations that are made in the informal sector, thus helping to establish the patterns of employment, its relationship with wages and with the activity of businesses which produce, for whom and how.
Wow, this is the field of microeconomics, which is usually below (and twisting) of aggregate macroeconomic considerations, which are those that are favored in government and are in the center of measures to achieve financial stability. With polls available
can move forward in other considerations that revolve around a theme associated with informality and the inequality.
The poorest households spend more than they earn. This deficit is covered in different ways, but tend to confine the families to a personal and social status that costs a lot to overcome, if that is achieved. But this issue of the deficit has expanded in recent years at least half of the households in the country, of course, in various magnitudes.
The labor market has great distortion. These include, for example, the phenomenon of migration. Informal accounts and stories of their economic and social should be coupled to the output of U.S. workers, reducing the pressure on employment and remittances contribute to increasing household income. Another issue is the wage dispersion, first among workers and then among them formal and informal.
Will the government's real intention to undertake against informality and content? Since mid 1990, it seems that even from the definition and implementation of policy Economic output has encouraged workers in the formal sector. Conceptions of governance different anchors needed to achieve the goals of stabilization of prices and wages.
This conception remains the core of tax administration in finance and money in the Bank of Mexico. This though did not create sustainable conditions for growth of output, employment and income. The cost of informality seems to be within the criteria that prevail in public policy. But what is often cheaper to get out more expensive.
EI 13 and a half million people working in the informal , which he characterized as those occupations without access to Social Security or any benefit.
This amounts, according to the agency, to 28.5 percent of the population in age and able to work, or who are between 14 and 65. This, which is called economically active population (EAP), sum 47 and a half million people. Tell
population is engaged in informal activities is an element to approach a better understanding of the employment situation and the consequent general social conditions in the country. It is part
also other considerations such as the effect on fiscal management both in terms of revenue received by the treasury as budget expenditures that are made to meet the conditions of life.
is a part of the sources and uses of public resources and the efficiency with which they are administered. Efficiency can not, of course, limited to accounting and financial criteria, but must somehow be extended to consider social efficiency.
forms are counting the informal variety. Inegi measurement is essentially based on the National Survey of Occupation and Employment. This should be supplemented with information from the National Survey of Income and Expenditure Survey, which is raised every two years.
Thus, the criteria for defining and counting the informal can be extended and refined. Both the coverage representing informality as its meaning changed and can offer a better perspective of social conditions.
With both tools leads to better classification of informal activities and providing the other party relevant to the considerations on the labor market and that has to do with income.
In terms of numbers, can be counted as informal manner up to 30 million people, ie twice the official estimate now provides Inegi. The share of informality in the labor force arrives, therefore the order of 60 percent. As to income, the average is at the order of 3 pesos per month in 1500.
Another issue has to do with the type of occupations that are made in the informal sector, thus helping to establish the patterns of employment, its relationship with wages and with the activity of businesses which produce, for whom and how.
Wow, this is the field of microeconomics, which is usually below (and twisting) of aggregate macroeconomic considerations, which are those that are favored in government and are in the center of measures to achieve financial stability. With polls available
can move forward in other considerations that revolve around a theme associated with informality and the inequality.
The poorest households spend more than they earn. This deficit is covered in different ways, but tend to confine the families to a personal and social status that costs a lot to overcome, if that is achieved. But this issue of the deficit has expanded in recent years at least half of the households in the country, of course, in various magnitudes.
The labor market has great distortion. These include, for example, the phenomenon of migration. Informal accounts and stories of their economic and social should be coupled to the output of U.S. workers, reducing the pressure on employment and remittances contribute to increasing household income. Another issue is the wage dispersion, first among workers and then among them formal and informal.
Will the government's real intention to undertake against informality and content? Since mid 1990, it seems that even from the definition and implementation of policy Economic output has encouraged workers in the formal sector. Conceptions of governance different anchors needed to achieve the goals of stabilization of prices and wages.
This conception remains the core of tax administration in finance and money in the Bank of Mexico. This though did not create sustainable conditions for growth of output, employment and income. The cost of informality seems to be within the criteria that prevail in public policy. But what is often cheaper to get out more expensive.
0 comments:
Post a Comment